Elon Musk Is Approaching Twitter As If Its Users Are Interchangeable. Is He Right?
Since taking over Twitter last week, Elon Musk has found himself embroiled in multiple controversies, including his clashes with two of the most high-profile users on the site, novelist Stephen King (who has 6.9 million followers) and congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (who has 13.5 million followers. Both King and AOC were expressing their discontent with Musk’s plan to charge users $8 a month (originally $20 a month, before King protested) for the so-called blue check, which verified users at Twitter currently get for free.
On Tuesday, AOC tweeted “Lmao at a billionaire earnestly trying to sell people on the idea that ‘free speech’ is actually a $8/mo subscription plan,” to which Musk replied, “Your feedback is appreciated, now pay $8.” That response got more than a million likes, and sparked a debate across the site over Musk’s plan and over his willingness to alienate current blue checks (of which, full disclosure, I am one) in pursuit of more revenue for the company.
My position on this, which I wrote about this week for Fast Company, is that alienating so-called power users — high-volume, high-follower accounts —is a bad idea. The economic reality of Twitter’s business is that it is highly dependent on the content produced by these power users, who generate most of the…
